Does
the VA recognize peripheral
neuropathy as due to exposure
to Agent Orange in Vietnam and
Korea?
Yes.
Under the VA’s gold standard of
the Ranch Hand Study and the Air
Force Study, Peripheral Neuropathy
is connected to exposure to the
components of Agent Orange.
However, under the presumption list
of disease that are presumed to
be caused by exposure to Agent Orange,
the VA only recognizes Acute and
Sub-Acute Peripheral Neuropathy,
which they define as symptoms that
appear shortly after exposure and
remit or cease in a few years. The
question would be, why even list
it.
However, the law permits the veteran
to establish proof of a direct connection
between exposure to Agent Orange,
symptoms of a chronic neuropathy,
diagnosis and medical history by
establishment of reasonable doubt
and the principle of high probability.
2010 update from the Institute of Medicine related to VA recognition of presumption for only Acute/Sub-Acute Peripheral Neuropathy
In the 2010 update, the Institute of Medicine committee recommends that the VA search its own records to look for possible associations between Vietnam service and specific health outcomes, specifically those that are relatively uncommon.
The only modification made in this update to disease entries in the categories of association is the notation that early-onset peripheral neuropathy (a condition which has been recognized since Update 1996 as having limited or suggestive evidence of an association with herbicide exposure but which must have developed within a year of exposure) is not necessarily transitory as the VA still claims for presumptive cause of neuropathy.
This undermines further the claim of the VA that AO causes only acute/sub-acute neuropathy. Similar to the VA denials of a relationship between AO and cancers since the Vietnam War and in the VA endless appeals to law suits brought by veterans in the 1990’s, the fact that AO does cause chronic forms of neuropathy years after exposure will become fact in the near future
This is why every Veteran with the symptoms of Neuropathy MUST file and APPEAL to keep the issue before the VA. The Veterans with cancers may have lost the individual battles of the 1990’s, but this is exactly why the IOM/VA was forced to have the research of 2007 done and so they won the war for so many others and for a few lucky ones, for themselves.
It is important to note that the IOM continues to recommend that laboratory research be conducted to characterize Agent Orange’s potential for inducing epigenetic modifications. Work needs to be undertaken to resolve questions regarding several health outcomes, most importantly COPD, tonsil cancer, melanoma, brain cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and paternally transmitted effects to offspring.
Facts
about Peripheral Neuropathy
and exposure to the components
of Agent Orange in Vietnam,
Korea, the waters off Vietnam
and other places it was processed,
handled or used:
The Environmental Protection Agency
decades ago confirmed the connection
between Agent Orange / dioxin with
Peripheral Neuropathy numerous times
and in their literature they do
not limit the neuropathy to only
the acute form as does the VA. The
EPA years ago noted that Agent Orange
and the components of dioxin were
serious toxins and carcinogen, but
this was ignored for decades. Other
medical literature warned of the
possible dangers of dioxin years
before its use in Vietnam, finding
connections to serious illnesses,
including the neuropathies, warning
of the dire consequences. These
warnings were ignored.
When veterans in the 1990’s sued
the VA because they were dying of
cancers (cancer and related treatments
are a known cause of neuropathy),
the VA fought multiple law suits
by veterans, appealed any favorable
verdict repeatedly, avoiding helping
these veterans and their families
who were dying of cancers since
the Vietnam War. The high probability
was ignored by everyone.
Now in December 2007 (again many
decades later) a research study
was published from the University
of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinarian
Medicine which confirmed that components
of Agent Orange caused a heretofore
unknown destructive effect on the
basic cellular structure of the
human body and was a serious toxin
and a carcinogen of the worse kind.
Beyond the failure to respect the
warnings and findings decades ago,
many doctors and Neurologists still
do not fully understand the clinical
skills needed to diagnose and treat
patients with Peripheral Neuropathy.
There is much neuropathy research
demanding to be done.
Training of neurologists in 2010
still does not include a significant
consideration of Peripheral Neuropathy
or provide the needed clinical education.
This failure is due to multiple
issues including poor attitudes,
little awareness, dismissive thinking
on neuropathy, resulting in limited
clinical training and research and
minimum serious long term research.
One of the largest missed opportunities
in research on toxic neuropathies
is the fact of the chronic neuropathies
in thousands of veterans, decades
after exposure during the Vietnam
and Korean Wars. Such research would
have increased our understanding
of toxic neuropathies beyond old
thinking, because we assumed there
was no relevance and closed our
medical eyes to new possibilities!
Medicine is slowly coming to terms
with the fact that Peripheral Neuropathy
is a potentially serious condition
and a disease of the Peripheral
Nervous system, often leading to
serious disability and is not JUST the
symptom of something else. Every
disease is a symptom of something
else yet they are still a disease
when a major body system is affected.
After four decades of a failure
to diagnose my own polyneuropathy,
following exposure to Agent Orange
in Vietnam in 1968, I am puzzled
by statements that toxic neuropathies
are rare. Even in 2010 we still
do not have a broadly accepted
criteria or understanding for diagnosis of
many neuropathies including my own
and only old research on the neuropathies
toxins cause! Most conditions that
we cannot diagnose would be rare.
From my view point it is poor attitudes
and out dated thinking that have
allowed a failure to grasp one of
the greatest opportunities ever
in the toxic neuropathies. That
opportunity was the dismissal of
thousands upon thousands of veterans,
who when exposed to Agent Orange/dioxin
in Vietnam and Korea, became increasingly
and progressively symptomatic with
the chronic neuropathies decades
after exposure! The response was
that this was impossible because
neuropathies resolve once the person
is removed from exposure. Then there
is the qualifier that this happens “usually” and
it was this qualifier that should
have raised questions in minds to
ask better questions and challenge
old thinking.
Too many old assumptions and aged
thinking prevented medicine from
taking these neuropathies seriously
and asking new questions about old
assumptions or outdated findings
about toxic neuropathies. Who ever
thought before 2007 that dioxin caused
a hereto unknown destructive effect
on the very cellular structure of
the human body decades after exposure. (From
the proceedings of the Institute
of Medicine from research at the
University Of Pennsylvania School
Of Veterinarian Medicine in December
2007).
I was reassured in 1990 when in
a taped lecture to neuropathy patients,
a Board Certified Neurologist was
asked about Agent Orange. He stated
that dioxin was so safe he would
be willing to live and sleep in
it without fear. He then went on
to state as an expert, “that if
it does not affect the feet, it
is not toxic neuropathy.” So while
living in my body from “hell” from
immune mediated polyneuropathies,
I decided I had descended into hell
itself, for after all this was the
expert talking. It is time to really
listen to patients, not silence
them.
What does this mean to veterans
of Vietnam, Korea or other areas
exposed to this toxin, not to even
mention the children and others
who still live in toxic areas of
Vietnam? Is it strange that these
children of Vietnam decades later
suffer from the same symptoms as
me and other veterans exposed to
Agent Orange? Understand that this
is not political, for I am a center
right conservative American citizen,
opposed to any form of dictatorship
whether on the extreme left or right
and would gladly serve my country
again in any fight for freedom.
No, this is about what is right
and what is wrong, taking responsibility
when we are wrong and the values
of honor and service that I learned
as a military officer.
The foundation principle for dismissing
toxins as rarely causing Peripheral
Neuropathy is the long standing
principle that once a person is
removed from a toxin, the symptoms
of Peripheral Neuropathy will usually
cease and if the toxin is retained
in the human body, the levels are
not high enough to cause a chronic
neuropathy.
Now I must say that the mother of
any child actually understands this
principle well, for in their experience
with first aid, if a child who runs
into poison ivy in the woods and
you remove the child from the toxin,
wash off the area and apply some
creams, the symptoms remit. But
what many do not recognize is the
qualifier in such statements of “usually
remit when the patient is removed
from the toxin.” There are times
when assumptions about toxic neuropathies
often prevent good thinking and
medical doctors need to read the
book out of Harvard University on,
How Doctors Think by Dr. Groopman
MD.
It is known that toxins are stored
in the teeth, bones and fat of the
human body for years and that is
why the cancers and the growing
list of disease now recognized by
the VA, appeared decades following
exposure and why the VA now recognizes
birth defects in children fathered
by veterans exposed to Agent Orange,
such as spina bifida. Perhaps this
is a start to recognize why thousands
of veterans from Korea and Vietnam
plus other places, after exposure
to Agent Orange, suffered without
help or support for decades as we
turned our eyes sending them home.
This is why any argument by the
experts about dosages retained in
the human body not being high enough
is not even relevant. Any dosage
of dioxin is dangerous to the human
body and it is retained in the human
body for decades, proven by the
growing list of presumed conditions
recognized by the VA, but denied
only a few years ago to so many
veterans of Vietnam and Korea plus.
One of the well known causes of
Peripheral Neuropathy is type two
diabetes, which the VA notes is
caused by exposure to Agent Orange
and so chronic peripheral neuropathy
secondary to diabetes would be approved
by the VA. Thus the standards of
the VA, with claims that Agent Orange
involves only acute forms of neuropathy
and not chronic forms fail again
the test of time and fact.
I know, you say this neuropathy
is caused by diabetes and that is
why it is chronic. Yet many veterans
have been recognized and approved
by the VA having service connected
chronic neuropathy outside of diabetes
due to exposure to Agent Orange.
Is it possible that it is diabetes
plus another form of autoimmune
neuropathy or maybe even exposure
to Agent Orange itself? Of course,
assumptions sometimes are the worst
enemy of good thinking and when
one assumes the cause is diabetes,
medical science rests and looks
no further.
I remember the patient diagnosed
with diabetic neuropathy and the
doctor stopped looking. When the
patient came to me for guidance
and help, after listening to the
patient it sure looked to this layman
like they had something going on
with the vascular system. Not being
a doctor, but armed with the patient
knowledge on Peripheral Neuropathy
in the book by Dr. Norman Latov,
MD (Neurologist - Weill Medical
of Columbia University), I referred
the patient to another doctor who
diagnosed vasculitic neuropathy,
treated it and perhaps saved the
patient’s life.
When Peripheral Neuropathy was first
listed by the VA in reference to
Agent Orange, the VA criteria was
very broad and Vietnam and Korean
veterans flocked to the VA for help.
The VA responded to this large surge
of veterans seeking help by reducing
the time criteria from exposure
to symptoms and from symptom on
set to remitting of symptoms. The
VA did this multiple times sharing
the fact of their uncertainty of
what was involved with Peripheral
Neuropathy. Then the VA stated that
the condition recognized is limited
to acute and sub-acute peripheral
neuropathy. This medical opinion
was based on NO research or fact
of note combined with old and unscientific
data or opinion. With these changes
any claim regarding Peripheral Neuropathy
based on presumed exposure to Agent
Orange became a useless waste of
time. To this day the VA continues
to claim that any chronic neuropathy
or polyneuropathy was not supported
by the data from the Ranch Hand
Study or Air Force Data, but then
this is not relevant either.
The Provost of Research, Dean of
the Graduate School of Kansas State
and President of Kansas State University
Research Foundation, Dr. R.W. Trewyn,
PhD (in cellular and molecular biology)
testified on March 15, 2000 before
a congressional committee, that
the Operation Ranch Hand Study,
Army Chemical Corp personnel study
in Vietnam and the Air Force Study
were so scientifically flawed on
every count, that they are basically
useless to science and had no validity
or reliability to prove anything.
He noted that the VA should give
every benefit of doubt to the veteran
exposed to Agent Orange. Of course
this never happened and this testimony
by this expert on research and biology
is buried under piles of paper along
with the veterans who died without
help or promised support. These
flawed studies have been the gold
standard for the VA decisions for
years until the research in 2007.
It is not surprising then that today
a number of veterans of Vietnam
have been approved by the VA for
benefits related to exposure to
Agent Orange and chronic Peripheral
Neuropathy. This was done, not on
the basis of presumption or the
VA definition, but on solid proof
of the connection between exposure
to Agent Orange, their medical history
and diagnosis of neuropathy with
all other causes ruled out.
Having shown that all other causes
of their neuropathy or polyneuropathy
were ruled out by testing, showing
that the veteran served in Vietnam
or Korea during war, were exposed
to Agent Orange via clothing, equipment,
food, water, or by breathing the
air or smoke from the old dioxin
barrels used to burn waste, they
proved their case. This occurred
on the legally recognized basis
of reasonable doubt, with the conclusion
reached based on the highest probability
that the veteran’s diagnosed condition
and disabilities were due to his
exposure to Agent Orange. Thus Agent
Orange was shown to be the highest
probable cause of their Peripheral
Neuropathy.
Veterans should consider using notarized
affidavits from the treating Neuromuscular
Neurologist, when the VA refuses
to recognize facts in the veteran’s
medical record. Affidavits from
your qualified doctor can be used
to counter opinions from unqualified
VA doctors. Did you know that by
VA law any doctor with an MD qualifies
to render an opinion in your case
and they may be from any field of
medicine? Many of them are often
retired, non-practicing and are
not Board Certified or have current
training. Affidavits from your qualified
doctor can be effective when misstatements
of fact are repeated in VA documents
until the VA even believes them!
The use of affidavits places the
expertise of your treating Board
Certified Neuromuscular Neurologists
in the court with you.
In the real world, few Neuromuscular
Neurologists will have the time
to write these documents and it
is doubtful you would be able to
afford the time it takes to pay
such a professional. Few Neuromuscular
Neurologists will have the time
to appear in court with you and
it is doubtful you will have the
funds to pay for such an appearance.
So what do you do?
Using the facts in your medical
record, write a DRAFT (get someone
to help you) of the document for
the doctor to consider and sign
on their letterhead adding a notary
seal. Remember, stick to the recorded
facts and the doctor should not
have a problem with the document.
The doctor can confirm any medical
conclusions regarding the facts
with their medical expertise and
updated sources of medical information
about Neuropathy. What you are establishing
is reasonable doubt while using
the accepted principle of highest
probability. If you show symptoms
of a neuropathy or polyneuropathy
after being exposed to Agent Orange,
symptoms which progress over years,
showing that medical tests have
ruled out all other causes, then
the highest probability is that
your chronic neuropathy is due to
your exposure to Agent Orange.
Please download the
booklet (A Guide to Successful Legal
Cases and Affidavits….) which will
show you samples of such affidavits
and the logic used in court hearings
by the VA resulting in approval
of the connection between Agent
Orange exposure and a Chronic Peripheral
Neuropathy.
DISCLAIMER: The
information on this web site or the links
or in the guidance provided is intended
to be educational and informative and not
medically prescriptive or diagnostic. All
patients are encouraged to consult with
their own medical doctor when considering
any information contained in this web site
or other web sites noted.
|